Regional variation in Argentinean populations of Bromus catharticus (Poaceae) as measured by morphological


  • Mónica B. Aulicino Instituto Fitotécnico Santa Catalina, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales, Universidad Nacional de La Plata
  • Miguel J. Arturi Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales, Universidad Nacional de La Plata



Bromus catharticus, genetic variation, morphotypes, numerical taxonomy, phenotypic variation, quantitative traits, rescue grass


Thirty-one populations of Bromus catharticus Vahl., collected from the Pampean Dominion (Argentina), were classified using twenty four highly heritable traits by numerical taxonomic methods. After implementing a stepwise discriminant analysis, 18 traits were chosen as classificatory variables. Eight population groups were classified in two main clusters. Different morphotypes, primarily associated with panicle architecture and micro floral traits, were found. The patterns in the morphological variation seem to correspond to a gradient of humidity and temperature that diminishes from the NE to the SW. This pattern of classification reflects the geographical origin for most of the sampled populations, although there was some noise. Our results fit the patchy variation model, where populations are genetically selected for macro and micro environmental conditions.


Download data is not yet available.


Almeida-Pinheiro de Carvalho, M.A. Wilcock, C.C., Marques Dos Santos, T.M., Vale-Lucas, I.C., Teixeira-Ganança, J.F., Thangadurai, D., Muralidhara-Rao, D. & Freitas-Sousa, D. 2004. A review of the genus Semele (Ruscaceae) systematic in Madeira. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 146: 483-497. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2004.00351.x

Amurrio, J.M., Ron, A.M. De & Zeven, A.C. 1995. Numerical taxonomy of Iberian pea landraces based on quantitative and qualitative characters. Euphytica 82: 195-205. doi:10.1007/BF00029561

Anderson, S. 1989. Phenotypic plasticity in Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae). Plant Systematic and Evolution 168: 19-38. doi:10.1007/BF00936104

Armstrong, K.C. 1981. The evolution of Bromus inermis and related species of Bromus Sect Pnigma. Botanische Jahrbücher Systematisch 102: 427-443.

Arunachalam, S. 1981. Genetic distance in plant breeding. Annals of Botany 72: 515-520.

Aulicino, M.B. & Arturi, M.J. 2002. Phenotypic diversity in Argentinean populations of Bromus catharticus (Poaceae). Genetic and environmental components of quantitative traits. New Zealand Journal of Botany 40(2): 223-234.

Bradshaw, A.D. 1965. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Advance in Genetics 13: 115-155.

Brown, A.H.D. 1989. Core collections: a practical approach to genetic resources management. Genome 31: 818-824.

Burkart, A. 1969. Flora ilustrada de Entre Ríos (Argentina). Gramíneas Parte II. In: Colección Científica del INTA. Buenos Aires. Argentina. VI: 65-70.

Cappannini, D. 1968. Principales unidades edáficas de la provincia de Buenos Aires. Gramíneas Parte II. In: Colección Científica del INTA. Buenos Aires. Argentina.

Clayton, W.D. & Renvoize, S.A. 1986. Genera Graminum. Grasses of the world. Kew Bulletin Additional Series 13: 1-389.

Costanza, M.C. & Afifi, A.A. 1979. Comparison of stopping rules in forward stepwise discriminant analysis. Journal of American Statistical Association 74: 777-785. doi:10.2307/2286399

Dickinson, T.A. & Phipps, J.B.P. 1985. Studies in Crataegus L. (Rosaceae: Maloideae). XIII. Degree and pattern of phenotypic variation in Crataegus sect Crus-galli in Ontario. Systematic Botany 10(3): 322-337. doi:10.2307/2418596

Dunn, G. & Everitt, B.S. 1982. An introduction to mathematical taxonomy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Fischer, M. 2004. Evolutionary plant ecology in the heterogeneous cultural landscape. In: Abstract of the 13 Symposium on Plant population ecology and genetics in the cultural landscape. Giessen, Germany 13-17 September 2004. T13-01.

García, M. & Arturi, M. 1992. Variabilidad fenotípica en progenies de Bromus catharticus Vahl. originadas de flores chasmógamas y cleistógamas. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía de La Plata 68: 27-33. Argentina.

Gutiérrez, H.F. & Pensiero, J.F. 1998. Sinopsis de las especies argentinas del Género Bromus (Poaceae). Darwiniana 35: 75-114.

Khattree, R. & Naik, D.N. 2000. Multivariate data reduction and discrimination with SAS Software. In: Wiley, J. & Sons (eds.). Cary, North Caroline.

Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. 1998. Numerical Ecology. Second edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Loveless, M.D. & Hamrick, J.L. 1984. Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Annual Review of Systematic and Ecology 15: 65-95. doi:10.1146/

Mantel, N.A. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and generalized approach. Cancer Research 27: 209-220.

Mapas de Suelos de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (Escala 1: 500.000). 1989. In: INTA-CIRN Departamento de suelos y Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca. Buenos Aires. Argentina.

Marshall, D.R. & Brown, A.H.D. 1975. Optimum sampling strategies in genetic conservation. Crop genetic resources for today and tomorrow. In: Frankel, O.H., & Hawkes, J.G. (eds). Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Pp 53-80.

Massa, A.N., Jensen, K.B., Larson, S.R. & Hole, D.J. 2004. Morphological variation in Bromus sect. Ceratochloa germoplasm of Patagonia. Canadian Journal of Botany 82: 136-144. doi:10.1139/b03-133

Pahlen, A.W. Von Der. 1986. Evaluation of genetic variability of some native forage plants. Boletín de Genética del Instituto Fitotécnico 14: 1-6.

Pérez López, F. 1975. Estudio de la variabilidad de Bromas unioloides de diferentes hábitats. M Sc Thesis, Escuela de Gra duación en Ciencias Agropecuarias. INTA. Castelar. Argentina.

Peterson, P.M. & Planchuelo, A.M. 1998. Bromus catharticus in South America (Poaceae: Bromeae). Novon 8: 53-60. doi:10.2307/3391893

Pistorale, S., Wolf, R. & Bazzigalupi, O. 1999. Dormancy and seed germination in natural populations of Bromus catharticus Vahl. (cebadilla criolla). Journal of Genetics and Breeding 53: 47-55

Planchuelo, A.M. 1991. Estudios sobre el complejo Bromas catharticus (Poaceae) I. Evaluación estadística de los caracteres taxonómicos. Kurtziana 21: 243-257.

Puecher, D.I., Robredo, C.G., Rios, R.D. & Rimieri, P. 2001. Genetic variability measures among Bromus catharticus Vahl. populations and cultivars with RAPDS and AFLP markers. Euphytica 121: 229-236. doi:10.1023/A:1012068415647

Ragonese, A.E. & Marcó, P.R. 1941. Observaciones sobre la biología floral de la cebadilla criolla. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía de La Plata 8: 197-199.

Richards, A.J. 1986. Plant breeding systems. In: Allen, Ch. I., & Unwin (eds.). London.

Rohlf, F.J. 1998. NTSYS-pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system (version 2.0f). Exeter Software Publishers Ltd. Setanket. New York.

Saarela, J.M, Peterson, P.M., Keane, R.M., Cayouette, J., & Graham, S.W. 2007. Molecular phylogenetics of Bromus (Poaceae: Pooideae) based on chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequence data. Aliso 23: 379-396.

Sales, F. 1994. Evolutionary tendencies in some annual species of Bromus (Bromus L. Sect. Genea Dum. (Poaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 115: 197-210.

Sánchez, J.J., Goodman, M.M. & Rawlings, J.O. 1993. Appropriate characters for racial classification in maize. Economy Botany 47: 44-59.

Smith, P.M. 1970. Taxonomy and nomenclature of the Bromegrasses. Proceeding of Royal Botanic Garden of Edinburgh 30: 361-375.

Smith, P.M. 1981. Ecotypes and subspecies in annual brome grasses (Bromus, Gramineae). Botanische Jahrbücher Systematisch 102: 497-509.

Sneath, P.H.A. & Sokal, R.R. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy: The principles and practice of numerical classification. In: Freeman, W.H., & Co (eds.). San Francisco.

Stebbins, G.L. 1981. Chromosome and evolution in the genus Bromus (Gramineae). Botanische Jahrbücher Systematisch 102: 359- 379.

Stebbins, G.L. & Tobgy, H.A. 1944. The cytogenetics of hybrids in Bromus. I. Hybrids within the section Ceratochloa. American Journal of Botany 31: 1-11. doi:10.2307/2437661

Szpiniak, B., Ferreira, V., Sepliarsky, A. & Irico, M. 1995. Análisis de la variación de Bromus catharticus Vahl. en ambientes subhúmedos- secos de la República Argentina con fines de mejoramiento. Mendeliana 11: 84-98.

Tricart, J.L.F. 1973. Geomorfología de la Pampa Deprimida. Bases para los estudios edafológicos y agronómicos. In: Colección Científica del INTA. Buenos Aires. Argentina.

Wolff, R., Abbott, L. & Pistorale, S. 1996. Reproductive behaviour of Bromus catharticus Vahl. (Cebadilla criolla) in natural and cultivated populations. Journal of Genetics and Breeding 50: 121-128.




How to Cite

Aulicino, M. B., & Arturi, M. J. (2008). Regional variation in Argentinean populations of Bromus catharticus (Poaceae) as measured by morphological. Anales Del Jardín Botánico De Madrid, 65(1), 135–147.