Structure of staminate flowers, microsporogenesis, and microgametogenesis in Helosis cayennensis var. cayennensis (Balanophoraceae)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/ajbm.2362Keywords:
anther development, Balanophoraceae, Helosis, holoparasites, microgametogenesis, microsporogenesis, synandrium, unisexual flowersAbstract
We analyzed the microgametogenesis and microsporogenesis of the male flowers of the holoparasitic Helosis cayennensis (Sw.) Spreng. var. cayennensis using optical and scanning electron microscopy. The unisexual flowers are embedded in a dense mass of uniseriate trichomes (filariae). Male flowers have a tubular 3-lobed perianth, with bilayered and non vascularized tepals. The androecium consists of three stamens with filaments and thecae connated into a synandrium. It has adnate a free central pistillode without megagametophyte. Staminal filaments, fused at their base to the perianth tube and distally free along a short section, have a single vascular bundle. The distal portion of the synandrium is formed by nine pollen sacs: six outer sacs are located laterally to each filament and three longer inner sacs. The anther wall consists of the epidermis, two parietal layers (that collapse at anther maturity), and an uninucleate secretory tapetum. There is no endothecium. During microsporogenesis, the stem cells produce tetrads of microspores by meiosis. The cytokinesis is simultaneous, forming tetrahedrally arranged tetrads. When pollen grains are in the tricellular state, the synandrium emerges from the mass of filariae, and anthers dehiscence occurs apically through longitudinal slits. In conclusion, despite the extreme reduction of flowers, the anatomic characteristics and gametophyte development of staminate flowers of H. cayennensis are perfectly normal and functional. They are thus highly similar to other genera of the holoparasitic subfamily Helosidoideae. Sterile parts of flowers and inflorescence maintain the same distinctive and aberrant features of the plant vegetative parts.
Downloads
References
Blarer, A., Nickrent, D.L. & Endress, P.K. 2004. Comparative floral structure and systematic in Apodanthaceae (Rafflesiales). Plant Systematic and Evolution 245: 119-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00606-003-0090-2
Brewbaker, J.L. 1967. The distribution and phylogenetic significance of binucleate and trinucleate pollen grains in the angiosperms. American Journal of Botany 54: 1069-1083. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2440530
Davis, G.L. 1966. Systematic embryology of the angiosperms. J. Wiley, New York.
De Wilde, W.J.J.O. 2000. Myristicaceae. Flora Malesiana, Series I 14: 1-632.
Eames, A.J. 1961. Morphology of the angiosperms. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Eberwein, R.K. 2000. Morphologie und Taxonomie der Helosidoideae (Balanophoraceae). Linzer Biologische Beitraege 32: 615-616.
Eberwein, R.K. & Weber, A. 2004. Exorhopala ruficeps (Balanophoraceae): morphology and transfer to Helosis. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 146: 513-517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2004.00321.x
Eberwein, R., Nickrent, D.L. & Weber, A. 2009. Development and morphology of flowers and inflorescences in Balanophora papuana and B. elongata (Balanophoraceae). American Journal of Botany 96: 1055-1067. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0800289 PMid:21628256
Endress, P. 1996. Homoplasy in Angiosperm flower. In: Sanderson, M.J. & Hufford, L. (eds.), Homoplasy: The Recurrence of Similarity in Evolution. Academic Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-012618030-5/50014-9
Engell, K. 1979. Morphology and embryology of Scybalioideae (Balanophoraceae): 1. Corynaea crassa Hook. f. var. sprucei (Eichl.) B. Hansen. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 73: 155-166.
Erdtman, G. 1966. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy Angiosperms. Hafner Publishing Company, New York and London.
Esau, K. 1965. Plant anatomy, 2d ed. John Wiley, New York. PMid:16591300 PMCid:PMC219684
Fagerlind, F. 1938a. Bau und Entwicklung der floralen organe von Helosis cayennensis. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 312.
Fagerlind, F. 1938b. Ditepalanthus, eine neue Balanophoraceen-Gattung aus Madagaskar. Arkiv för Botanik 29 A. 24.
Fagerlind, F. 1945. Blu.te und Blu.tenstand der Gattung Balanophora. Botaniska Notiser 45: 330-350.
Fontana, J.L. & Popoff, O.F. 2006. Helosis (Balanophoraceae) en Argentina. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica 41: 85-90.
Gerenday, A. & French, J.C. 1988. Endothecial thickenings in anthers of porate Monocotyledons. American Journal of Botany 75: 22-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2443901
González, A.M. & Cristóbal, C. 1997. Anatomía y ontogenia de semillas de Helicteres lhotzkyana (Sterculiaceae). Bonplandia 9: 287-294.
González, A.M. & Mauseth, J.D. 2010. Morphogenesis is highly aberrant in the vegetative body of the holoparasite Lophophytum leandrii (Balanophoraceae): All typical vegetative organs are absent and many tissues are highly modified. International Journal of Plant Science 171: 499-508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/651947
Grayum, M.H. 1990. Evolution and Phylogeny of the Araceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 77: 628-697. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2399668
Hansen, B. 1980a. Pollen dimorphism in Lophophytum mirabile Schott& Endl. (Balanophoraceae). Grana 19: 189-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00173138009425003
Hansen, B. 1980b. Balanophoraceae. Flora Neotropica, Monograph 23: 1-80.
Hansen, B. & Engell, K. 1978. Inflorescences in Balanophoroideae, Lophophytoideae and Scybalioideae (Balanophoraceae). Dansk Botanisk Tidsskrift 72: 177-187.
Harms, H. 1935. Balanophoraceae. In: Engler, A. & Prantl, K. (eds.), Die Natürlichen Planzenfamilien, 296-339. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.
Harris, J.A. 1905. The dehiscence of anthers by apical pores. Annual Report of the Missouri Botanical Garden 16: 167-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2400084
Heide-Jørgensen, H.S. 2008. Parasitic flowering plants. Brill Academic Publishers, Leiden. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004167506.i-438 PMCid:PMC2605821
Hsiao, S.C., Mauseth, J.D. & Gómez, L.D. 1993. Growth and anatomy of the vegetative body of the parasitic angiosperm Helosis cayennensis (Balanophoraceae). Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 120: 295-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2996994
Huaxing, Q. & Gilbert, M.G. 2003. Viscaceae. Flora of China 5: 240-245.
Johansen, D.A. 1940. Plant Microtechnique. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Kuijt, J. 1969. The biology of parasitic flowering plants. University of California Press.
Lotsy, J.P. 1901. Rhopalocnemis phalloides, a morphological-systematic study. Annales du Jardin Botanique de Buitenzorg 2: 73-101.
Luque, R.H., Sousa, C. & Kraus, J.E. 1996. Métodos de coloraçao de Roeser (1972)-modificado- e Kropp (1972) visando a subtituicao do azul de astra por azul de alciaô 8 GS ou 8 GX. Acta Botânica Brasileira 10: 199-212.
Maheshwari, P. 1950. An introduction to the embryology of angiosperms. Mc-Graw-Hill, New York.
Martínez y Pérez, J.L. & Rosas, R.A. 1995. Balanophoraceae. Flora de Veracruz 85: 1-7.
Mauseth, J.D. & Montenegro, G. 1992. Secondary wall ingrowths on vessel elements in Ombrophytum subterraneum (Balanophoraceae). American Journal of Botany 79: 456-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2445159
Mauseth, J.D., Hsiao, S.C. & Montenegro, G. 1992. Vegetative body of the parasitic angiosperm Helosis cayennensis (Balanoporaceae). Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 119: 407-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2996729
Nickrent, D.L. 2002. Orígenes filogenéticos de las plantas parásitas. In: López-Sáez, J.A., Catalán, P. & Sáez, L. (eds.), Plantas parásitas de la península Ibérica e islas Baleares. Madrid: Mundi-Prensa, 29-56.
Punt, W., Blackmore, S., Nilsson S. & Le Thomas, A. 1994. Glossary of pollen and spore terminology. LPP Foundation, University of Utrecht. PMCid:PMC1422326
Punt, W., Hoen, P.P., Blackmore, S., Nilsson, S. & Le Thomas, A. 2007. Glossary of pollen and spore terminology. Review of Paleobotany and Palynology 143: 1-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2006.06.008
Rutherford, R.J. 1970. The anatomy and cytology of Pilostyles thurberi Gray (Rafflesiaceae). Aliso 7: 263-288.
Ruzin, S.E. 1999. Plant microtechnique and microscopy. Oxford University Press. PMid:9952452 PMCid:PMC32133
Sato, H.A. & González, A.M. 2013. Flores estaminadas en Lophophytum. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica 48: 59-72.
Sauquet, H. 2003. Androecium diversity and evolution in Myristicaceae (Magnoliales), with a description of a new malagasy genus, Doyleanthus gen. nov. American Journal of Botany 90: 1293-1305. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.9.1293
Shu-Chuan, H., Mauseth, J.D. & Gómez, L.D. 1993. Growth and anatomy of the vegetative body of the parasitic angiosperm Helosis cayennensis (Balanophoraceae). Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 120: 295-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2996994
Takhtajan, A.L. 2009. Flowering plants. Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9609-9
Tebbitt, M.C. & Maciver, C.M. 1999. The systematic significance of the endotheciun in Begoniaceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 131: 203-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1999.tb00765.x
Umiker, O. 1920. Entwicklungsgeschichtlich-cytologische Untersuchungen an Helosis guyanensis Rich. Arbeiten des Instituts fu.r Allgemeine Botanik und Pflanzenphysiologie der Universität Zürich 23: 1-54.
Van Steenis, C.G.G.J. 1931. Some remarks on the genus Rhopalocnemis Junghuhn. Handelingen 6. Nederl.-Indich Natuurwetenschappel Congress, Bandoeng, Java. Meded. Biol. Sectie 464-475.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.