Strong inbreeding depression and individually variable mating system in the narrow endemic Erodium cazorlanum (Geraniaceae)


  • Conchita Alonso Estación Biológica de Doñana, CSIC (EBD-CSIC)
  • Marina García-Sevilla Estación Biológica de Doñana, CSIC (EBD-CSIC)



endemism, geitonogamy, inbreeding depression, mating system, self compatibility, stigmatic pollen load


Angiosperms evolved different systems to attract effective pollinators while reducing selfing in hermaphroditic flowers. Selfing ability can be advantageous when pollinators and/or mates are scarce, although inbreeding depression may largely reduce those advantages. Recent comparative analyses suggested endemic species tend to evolve self-compatibility but a better understanding of the associated reproductive and genetic tradeoffs is required. Experimental hand-pollinations under greenhouse conditions were conducted to investigate the selfing ability and estimate inbreeding depression up to the offspring’ first reproductive event in Ero dium cazorlanum, a narrow endemic species restricted to dolomite outcrops in SE Spanish mountains. We found autonomous selfing ineffective. Further, when experimentally applied, pollen of the same flower produced significantly fewer fruits and seeds compared to geitonogamous and cross pollinations. The number of seeds per fruit was significantly higher after cross pollinations and strong inbreeding depression accumulated through the life-cycle. Interestingly, individual plants exhibited broad variation in selfing ability with six out of 14 individuals producing no seed after geitonogamy. Understanding the consequences of individual variation in self compatibility deserves further investigation in the field now that we know that strong inbreeding depression may limit recruitment of selfed progeny.


Download data is not yet available.


Aizen, M.A. & Harder, L.D. 2007. Expanding the limits of the pollen-limitation concept: effects of pollen quantity and quality. Ecology 88: 271-281. PMid:17479745

Alarcón, M.L., Roquet, C. & Aldasoro, J.J. 2011. Evolution of pollen/ovule ratios and breeding system in Erodium (Geraniaceae). Systematic Botany 36: 661-676.

Albert, M.J., Escudero, A. & Iriondo, J.M. 2001. Female reproductive success of narrow endemic Erodium paularense in contrasting microhabitats. Ecology 82: 1734-1747.

Albert, M.J., Iriondo, J.M., Escudero, A. & Torres, E. 2008. Dissecting components of flowering pattern: size effects on female fitness. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 156: 227–236.

Allen, A.M. & Hiscock, S.J. 2008. Evolution and phylogeny of self-incompatibility systems in Angiosperms. In: V.E. Franklin-Tong (ed.), Self-incompatibility in flowering plants. Evolution, diversity, and mechanisms: 73-101. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.

Alonso, C., Garrido, J.L. & Herrera, C.M. 2004. Investigaciones sobre plantas y animales en las Sierras de Cazorla, Segura y Las Villas. 25 a-os de estudios por el CSIC. Sevilla, Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía.

Alonso, C., Herrera, C.M. & Ashman, T.L. 2012. A piece of the puzzle: a method for comparing pollination quality and quantity across multiple species and reproductive events. New Phytologist 193: 532-542. PMid:22007922

Alonso, C., Vamosi, J.C., Knight, T.M., Steets, J.A. & Ashman, T.-L. 2010. Is reproduction of endemic plant species particularly pollen limited in biodiversity hotspots? Oikos 119: 1192–1200.

Angeloni, F., Ouborg, N.J. & Leimu, R. 2011. Meta-analysis on the association of population size and life history with inbreeding depression in plants. Biological Conservation 144: 35-43.

Armbruster, W.S. & Rogers, D.G. 2004. Does pollen competition reduce the cost of inbreeding? American Journal of Botany 91: 1939-1943. Asikainen, E. & Mutikainen, P. 2005. Pollen and resource limitation in a gynodioecious species. American Journal of Botany 92: 487-494.

Barrett, S.C.H. 2003. Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing - selfing paradigm and beyond. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences 358: 991-1004. PMid:12831464 PMCid:PMC1693196

Barrett, S.C.H. 2008. Major evolutionary transitions in flowering plant reproduction: an overview. International Journal of Plant Sciences 169: 1-5.

Barrett, S.C.H., Cole, W.W. & Herrera, C.M. 2004. Mating patterns and genetic diversity in the wild daffodil Narcissus longispathus (Amaryllidaceae). Heredity 92: 459-465. PMid:15014425

Barringer, B.C. 2007. Polyploidy and self-fertilization in flowering plants. American Journal of Botany 94: 1527-1533. PMid:21636519

Blanca, G., Cabezudo, B., Cueto, M., Fernández López, C. & Morales Torres, C. 2009. Flora Vascular de Andalucía Oriental. Sevilla, Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía.

Burd, M. 2008. The Haig-Westoby model revisited. The American Naturalist 171: 400-404. PMid:18217857

Busch, J.W. 2005. The evolution of self-compatibility in geographically peripheral populations of Leavenworthia alabamica (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 92: 1503-1512. PMid:21646168

Busch, J.W. & Schoen, D. J. 2008. The evolution of self-incompatibility when mates are limiting. Trends in Plant Science 13: 128-136. PMid:18296103

Byers, D.L. 1995. Pollen quantity and quality as explanations for low seed set in small populations exemplified by Eupatorium (Asteraceae) . American Journal of Botany 82: 1000-1006.

Carrió, E., Jiménez, J.F., Sánchez-Gómez, P. & Güemes, J. 2009. Reproductive biology and conservation implications of three endangered snapdragon species (Antirrhinum, Plantaginaceae). Biological Conservation 142: 1854-1863.

Cheptou, P.-O. & Donohue, K. 2011. Environment-dependent inbreeding depression: its ecological and evolutionary significance. New Phytologist 189: 395-407. PMid:21091479

Cole, C.T. 2003. Genetic variation in rare and common plants. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 34: 213-237.

Crawford, D.J., Archibald, J.K., Kelly, J.K., Mort, M.E. & Santos-Guerra, A. 2010. Mixed mating in the 'obligately outcrossing' Tolpis (Asteraceae) of the Canary Islands. Plant Species Biology 25: 114-119.

Dafni, A. & Firmage, D. 2000. Pollen viability and longevity: practical, ecological and evolutionary implications. Plant Systematics and Evolution 222: 113-132.

Demauro, M.M. 1993. Relationship of breeding system to rarity in the lakeside daisy (Hymenoxys acaulis var.glabra). Conservation Biology 7: 542-550.

Ellstrand, N.C. & Elam, D.R. 1993. Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 217-242.

Glemin, S., Gaude, T., Guillemin, M.L., Lourmas, M., Olivieri, I. & Mignot, A. 2005. Balancing selection in the wild: Testing population genetics theory of self-incompatibility in the rare species Brassica insularis. Genetics 171: 279-289. PMid:15944365 PMCid:PMC1456519

Goldberg, E.E., Kohn, J.R., Lande, R. & Robertson, K.A. 2010. Species selection maintains self-incompatibility. Science 330: 493-495. PMid:20966249

Good-Avila, S.V., Mena-Alí, J.I. & Stephenson, A.G. 2008. Genetic and environmental causes and evolutionary consequences of variations in selffertility in self incompatible species. In: V.E. Franklin-Tong (ed.), Selfincompatibility in flowering plants. Evolution, diversity, and mechanisms: 33-52. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.

Good-Avila, S.V. & Stephenson, A.G. 2003. Parental effects in a partially self-incompatible herb Campanula rapunculoides L. (Campanulaceae): influence of variation in the strength of self-incompatibility on seed set and progeny performance. The American Naturalist 161: 615-630. PMid:12776888

Goodwillie, C., Kalisz, S. & Eckert, C.G. 2005. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 36: 47-79.

Harder, L.D., Richards, S.A. & Routley, M.B. 2008. Effects of reproductive compensation, gamete discounting and reproductive assurance on mating-system diversity in hermaphrodites. Evolution 62: 157-172. PMid:18067573

Herlihy, C.R. & Eckert, C.G. 2005. Evolution of self-fertilization at geographical range margins? Comparison of demographic, floral, and mating system variables in central vs. peripheral populations of Aquilegia canadensis (Ranunculaceae). American Journal of Botany 92: 744-751. PMid:21652454

Herrera, C.M. 2000. Flower-to-seedling consequences of different pollination regimes in an insect-pollinated shrub. Ecology 81: 15-29.[0015:FTSCOD]2.0.CO;2

Herrera, C.M. & Jovani, R. 2010. Lognormal distribution of individual lifetime fecundity: insights from a 23-year study. Ecology 91: 422-430. PMid:20392007

Hessing, M.B. 1989. Variation in self-fertility and floral characters of Geranium-caespitosum (Geraniaceae) along an elevational gradient. Plant Systematics and Evolution 166: 225-241.

Husband, B.C. & Schemske, D.W. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50: 54-70.

Igic, B., Lande, R. & Kohn, J.R. 2008. Loss of self-incompatibility and its evolutionary consequences. International Journal of Plant Science 169: 93-104.

Jong, T.J. de & Klinkhamer, P.G.L. 2005 Evolutionary ecology of plant reproductive strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kalisz, S. & Vogler, D.W. 2003. Benefits of Autonomous Selfing Under Unpredictable Pollinator Environments. Ecology 84: 2928-2942.

Kalla, S.E. & Ashman, T.-L. 2002. The effects of pollen competition on progeny vigor in Fragaria virginiana (Rosaceae) depend on progeny growth environment. International Journal of Plant Sciences 163: 335-340.

Karron, J.D., Holmquist, K.G., Flanagan, R.J. & Mitchell, R.J. 2009. Pollinator visitation patterns strongly influence among-flower variation in selfingrate. Annals of Botany 103: 1379-1383. PMid:19218584 PMCid:PMC2701766

Koelling, V., Hamrick, J. & Mauricio, R. 2011. Genetic diversity and structure in two species of Leavenworthia with self-incompatible and self-compatible populations. Heredity 106: 310-318. PMid:20485327 PMCid:PMC2927727

Lankinen, A. & Armbruster, W.S. 2007. Pollen competition reduces inbreeding depression in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 737-749. PMid:17305839

Lankinen, A. & Madjidian, J.A. 2011. Enhancing pollen competition by delaying stigma receptivity: pollen deposition schedules affect siring ability, paternal diversity, and seed production in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae). American Journal of Botany 98: 1191-1200. PMid:21730339

Lavergne, S., Thompson, J.D., Garnier, E. & Debussche, M. 2004. The biology and ecology of narrow endemic and widespread plants: a comparative study of trait variation in 20 congeneric pairs. Oikos 107: 505-518.

Levin, D.A. 1996. The evolutionary significance of pseudo-self-fertility. The American Naturalist 148: 321-332.

Marshall, D.L., Shaner, M.G.M. & Oliva, J.-P. 2007. Effects of pollen load size on seed paternity in wild radish: the roles of pollen competition and mate choice. Evolution 61: 1925–1937. PMid:17683434

Medrano, M., Alonso, C. & Herrera, C.M. 2005. Mating system, sex ratio, and persistence of females in the gynodioecious shrub Daphne laureola L. (Thymelaeaceae). Heredity 94: 37-43. PMid:15292912

Medrano, M. & Herrera, C.M. 2008. Geographical structuring of genetic diversity across the whole distribution range of Narcissus longispathus, a habitat-specialist, Mediterranean narrow endemic. Annals of Botany 102: 183-194. PMid:18556752 PMCid:PMC2712358

Mena-Alí, J.I., Keser, L.H. & Stephenson, A.G. 2008. Inbreeding depression in Solanum carolinense (Solanaceae), a species with a plastic self-incompatibility response. BMC Evolutionary Biology 8: 10. PMid:18199336 PMCid:PMC2244599

Mota, J.F., Medina-Cazorla, J.M., Navarro, F.B., Pérez-García, F.J., Pérez-Latorre, A., Sánchez-Gómez, P., Torres, J.A., Benavente, A., Blanca, G., Gil, C., Lorite, J. & Merlo, M.E. 2008. Dolomite flora of the Baetic Ranges glades (South Spain). Flora 203: 359-375.

Murray, B.R., Thrall, P.H., Gill, A.M. & Nicotra, A. B. 2002. How plant lifehistory and ecological traits relate to species rarity and commonness at varying spatial scales. Austral Ecology 27: 291-310.

Narbona, E., Ortiz, P.L. & Arista, M. 2011. Linking self-incompatibility, dichogamy, and flowering synchrony in two Euphorbia species: alternative mechanisms for avoiding self-fertilization? PlosOne 6: e20668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020668.

Nettancourt, D. de. 1977. Incompatibility in Angiosperms. Monographs on Theoretical and Applied Genetics. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.

Nielsen, L.R., Siegismund, H.R. & Hansen, T. 2007. Inbreeding depression in the partially self-incompatible endemic plant species Scalesia affinis (Asteraceae) from Galápagos islands. Evolutionary Ecology 21: 1-12.

Ortiz, M.A., Talavera, S., García-Casta-o, J. L., Tremetsberger, K., Stuessy, T., Balao, F. & Casimiro-Soriguer, R. 2006. Self-incompatibility and floral parameters in Hypochaeris sect. Hypochaeris (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 93: 234-244. PMid:21646184

Raduski, A.R., Haney, E.B. & Igic, B. 2012. The expression of self-incompatibility in angiosperms is bimodal. Evolution 66: 1275-1283. PMid:22486704

Richards, C. 2000. Inbreeding depression and genetic rescue in a plant metapopulation. The American Naturalist 155: 383-394. PMid:10718733

Robertson, A.W., Kelly, D. & Ladley, J.J. 2011. Futile selfing in the trees Fuchsia excorticata (Onagraceae) and Sophora microphylla (Fabaceae): inbreeding depression over 11 years. International Journal of Plant Science 172: 191-198.

Romero, R., Guijarro, J.A., Ramis, C. & Alonso, S. 1998. A 30-year (1964-1993) daily rainfall data base for the Spanish Mediterranean regions: First exploratory study. Journal of Climatology 18: 541-560.<541::AID-JOC270>3.0.CO;2-N

Romero, R., Ramis, C. & Guijarro, J.A. 1999. Daily rainfall patterns in the Spanish Mediterranean area: an objective classification. International Journal of Climatology 112: 95-112.<95::AID-JOC344>3.0.CO;2-S

SAS. 2008. SAS for Windows (version 9.2). Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute.

Schlichting, C.D. & Devlin, B. 1992. Pollen and ovule sources affect seed production of Lobelia cardinalis (Lobeliaceae). American Journal of Botany 79: 891-898.

Sun, S., Zhang, D.-Y., Ives, A.R. & Li, Q.-J. 2011. Why do stigmas move in a flexistylous plant? Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24: 497-504. PMid:21126274

Thompson, J.D., Lavergne, S., Affre, L., Gaudeul, M. & Debussche, M. 2005. Ecological differentiation of Mediterranean endemic plants. Taxon 54: 967-976.

Vamosi, J.C., Knight, T.M., Steets, J.A., Mazer, S.J., Burd, M. & Ashman, T.-L. 2006. Pollination decays in biodiversity hotspots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 103: 956-961. PMid:16418284 PMCid:PMC1347978

Weber, J.J. & Goodwillie, C. 2009. Evolution of the mating system in a partially self-incompatible species: reproductive assurance and pollen limitation in populations that differ in the timing of self-compatibility. International Journal of Plant Sciences 170: 885-893.

Zapata, T.R. & Arroyo, M.T.K. 1978. Plant reproductive ecology of a secondary deciduous tropical forest in Venezuela. Biotropica 10: 221-230.




How to Cite

Alonso, C., & García-Sevilla, M. (2013). Strong inbreeding depression and individually variable mating system in the narrow endemic Erodium cazorlanum (Geraniaceae). Anales Del Jardín Botánico De Madrid, 70(1), 72–80.